Conveyance of Mentally Ill Person from their Property: Which Legislation to Use? – Mental Capacity Act (MCA) or Mental Health Act (MHA) or Court of Protection
نویسندگان
چکیده
Aim and methods: The aim of this review is to consider the appropriate use of either legislation the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) or the Mental Health Act (MHA) or Court of Protection to transfer the patient/person from one accommodation to another for the purposes of care they need. The methodology used for this article is review of literature. Results: Conveyance of the person from one place to another poses a number of conflicting issues in terms of mental capacity, their independence, liberty and balancing with safety and protection of the person. MCA (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards), MHA (various sections 2 and 3, Guardianship Order) and Court of Protection can be used appropriately for the individuals concerned and situations that demand at the point of assessment. Clinical implications: Admissions to acute hospitals and mental health institutions that sometimes take place out of hours can be prevented to certain degree. If appropriate placement plans are made and adequate discussions are carried out to use MCA, MHA or Court of Protection then people would be appropriately placed in safe environment.
منابع مشابه
Priority Issues in Forensic Psychiatry
PRIORITY ISSUES IN FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY Sir, Forensic psychiatry is an emerging area of psychiatric specialization in the world. The last few decades have seen many important advances in the field of forensic psychiatry. These include the formulation of newer laws regulating the functioning of mental health care delivery systems, laws relating to the possession and use of psychotropic drugs, as ...
متن کاملThe critical role of advocacy under the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic)
This statement forms part of the National Association for Rights Protection and Advocacy (NARPA) call for action in the United States. However, it is a call that should be recognised and acted on by advocates in Victoria (and the rest of Australia). Currently, the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic) (MHA)—although a hard fought for improvement on the earlier laws — affords no real self-determination i...
متن کاملThe Bournewood gap (as amended?).
Both the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 authorise the treatment and detention of the mentally ill. Their interface is often clear cut. After all, the 1983 Act formally sanctions and safeguards compulsion where it is necessary to protect patients or others. Individuals can only be detained for psychiatric, not physical, health purposes. And such detention can only take p...
متن کاملMental Health Act, Salient Features, Objectives, Critique and Future Directions
Mental health legislation is essential for protecting the rights and dignity of persons with mental disorders, and for developing accessible and effective mental health services. Effective mental health legislation can provide a legal framework to integrate mental health services into the community and to overcome stigma, discrimination and exclusion of mentally-ill persons. Legislation can als...
متن کاملAttitudes among stakeholders towards compulsory mental health care in Norway.
OBJECTIVES The Norwegian Mental Health Care Act allows use of coercion under certain conditions. Even though the current practice has been criticized, little empirical data exist about the attitudes towards compulsory mental health care. METHOD This study used Q-methodology to identify prototypical attitudes and to test possible differences of attitudes between groups of stakeholders towards ...
متن کامل